LONDON, ENGLAND, January 20, 2004: Hindus in the UK are starting a campaign to reclaim the swastika from its Nazi associations. German MEPs called for a Europe-wide ban of the symbol after Prince Harry wore it on a fancy dress costume. But Hindu Forum spokesman Ramesh Kallidai said the swastika had been a Hindu good luck charm for centuries. The group will stage public awareness workshops across the UK and lobby politicians in an attempt to educate the public and prevent a ban, he said. "It's the second most sacred symbol in the Hindu tradition which has been used for 5,000 years to ward off evil," Mr. Kallidai said. The forum would make a particular effort to get the message across to Jewish groups, he added. "After all it is the Jewish anguish that needs to be considered. They were the community that was most affected by the misuse of the swastika so naturally they would have concerns. "Hindus use the swastika merely as a religious sacrament, to express their devotion to God, surely nobody can have any objections to that," he said.
Displaying the swastika is illegal in Germany. However, Mr. Kallidai said a similar ban in the UK would have an adverse affect on Hindus who regarded a swastika in much the same way as a Christian viewed a cross. Buddhists also view the swastika as a good luck charm. "You find it in houses, temples and in portraits of Hindu gods. A swastika is even painted on the head of a baby who's just had his first hair-cutting sacrament," he said. The Hindu swastika faces to the right, unlike the one adopted by the Nazis which faces to the left. (HPI note: This is a commonly repeated but incorrect statement. Hindus use both the left- and right-handed swastikas, and examples can be found of both together on Indus Valley seals.) It is also traditionally red, a color regarded as auspicious by Hindus. "Just because at a particular moment in history one section of society used it, or a mirror image, to unleash xenophobic ideology does not mean Hindus should be punished," Mr. Kallidai said. "It's like saying the Ku Klux Klan burn crosses so therefore let's ban the use of crosses worldwide."
The Hindu Forum's campaign has gained backing from other groups. Maganbhai Patel of Leicester's Hindu Association said the general public's confusion needed to be addressed. "Hindus have been using the swastika for centuries, whereas it was only adopted by Hitler comparatively recently, in the 1920s and 1930s. "We use it for marriage ceremonies and also for other religious ceremonies and events," Mr. Patel said. And Kapil Dudakia, of Milton Keynes Hindu Association, said the swastika was viewed "positively" by billions of people around the world including followers of the Buddhist and Jain faiths. "When I got married, literally as soon as you entered the hall where the marriage took place you saw swastikas everywhere. They were also on the invitation cards," he said. "It's only in certain quarters of the Western world where you've got these very negative connotations. "What we've got to do is separate the evil of Hitler and his ideology from the symbol of the swastika which actually means something quite different," Mr. Dudakia said. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4188141.stm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I would quite agree with Maganbhai Patel and Mr. Dudakia.
May add that this would problabley have a cascading effect on the rest of the world. A ban will also affect a lot of other religions too, as the symbol is found pettty much all over the world it wil also affect followers of religions such as the Native Americans Shamenism, The ancient greeks, celts, romans(?), anglo-saxond, and vikings so it applies to religious reconstructionist groups of those european religions too. its also seen in northern africa (Solomon) and as far as Japan (Shinto).
If europe is going to go that far as to (try)erase its past. Why not ban the cross as well as the swastika, since more people have suffered under the cross for a period of of over probabley around 1300 years (WORLDWIDE) and the cross is a symbol is asociated with Roman torture capital punishment and public shame why sweep that under the carpet as well?, If they are going to use one rule just as a respect for 1 race of peoples it would only be fair to ban the Cross out of respect for people who have been killed/persecuted in the name of Jesus/Jehova, including Africans, Native Americans, Asians as far as China/Japan and Pagans in Europe ... would you not agree?
The Germans just want to ban it because they are ashamed of their mistakes in history (even they SAY they are doing it out of respect) but it will not stop racism in europe, never mind Germany.
The Germans want to forget their past whereas many Jews are practically living in it, some are bitter (understandabley) and have not quite got over the 1940s or moved on since. Does that justify a ban in the UK just because this country is ruled by a bunch of Fat Christians who would be more than happy to quash the rest of non-christian religions including Hinduism, Jainism and Paganism of various flavors?
A ban is just an irrisponsible thing to do. Europe should not live in the past, but learn from it.
Chris
Post a Comment